![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Mac Dowell, (lost at Corregidor); Wilcoxen; Lt. Kinsella; Lt. Adkins; Cdr. (Fearless Freddy) Warder; Lt. Deragon; Lt Holden; Watts; Jobe Second Row: Butler (lost on Tullibee); Tremblay; Langford; Delnigro; Metz; Capece; Perry (lost at Corregidor); Hershey; Bennet; Leffingwell Third Row: Sandridge (killed at Perth); Lober; Baker; Carney; Cross; Apperson; Sullivan; Crawford; Harris; Lamberson; Eckberg; Franz Fourth Row: Campbell; Connely; Jenkins; Hutchinson; Gervais; Butler; Rajjotte; Poole (lost on the Flier); Lipham Fifth Row: Enslin; Street; Kibbons (lost on Shark); Mocarsky; Evans; Crane; Bateman; Dvorack; Randazzo; Hickman; Dishman; Rozel; Parden |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
| USS SEAWOLF (SS-197),
under the command of LCdr A.M. Bontier, left Brisbane on 21 September 1944
beginning her 15th patrol, and arrived at Manus on 29 September. Leaving
Manus on the same day, SEAWOLF was directed to carry certain stores and
Army personnel to the east coast of Samar.
On 3 October SEAWOLF
and USS NARWHAL (SS-167) exchanged SJ radar recognition signals at 0756.
Later the same day an enemy submarine attack was made at 2-32'N;129-18'E,
which resulted in the sinking of USS SHELTON. Since there were four friendly
submarines in the vicinity of this attack, they were directed to give their
positions, and the other three
USS ROWELL and an aircraft attacked a submarine in the vicinity of the attack on SHELTON, having at that time no knowledge of any friendly submarines in the area, and it was thought that SEAWOLF must be held down by these antisubmarine activities. It is possible that SEAWOLF was the submarine attacked. The report from ROWELL
indicates that an apparently lethal attack was conducted in conjunction
with a plane which marked the spot with dye. ROWELL established sound contact
on the submarine, which then sent long dashes and dots which ROWELL state
bore no resemblance to the existing recognition signals. After one of the
several hedgehog attacks a small
In view of the above facts, and the fact that there is no attack listed in the Japanese report of antisubmarine attacks which could account for the loss of SEAWOLF, it is possible that SEAWOLF was sunk by friendly forces in an antisubmarine attack on 3 October 1944, in the vicinity of 2-32'N;129-18'E. It is also possible that she was lost to an operational casualty or as a result of an unrecorded enemy attack. Above information from Subnet.com: http://www.subnet.com/fleet/ss197.htm |
| Read / Sign our Deck Log |
The author is a Member of The HTML Writers Guild